Due to sudden increase in the practice of agriculture in Brazil, the Amazon rainforest has been decreasing drastically in the past 40 years. In the website of the Earth Observatory of NASA it is possible to examine the increase of deforestation in Amazon since 2000 and 20091. This issue has been highlighted for many years but since Brazil is a large-scale exporter of agricultural products it has been ignored. However, in the past decade the interest in climate change grew among Brazilian NGO’s and they established a plan to fight this environmental issue2.
Plus, in orders to fight the problem is necessary to find its root. Therefore, it was necessary to indicate the people responsible for the deforestation and also the multinational corporations that are financing them. For instance, in 2006 Greenpeace linked McDonalds to illegal deforestation4. Thus, the bad marketing caused by these allegations raised many protests by activists who dressed as chickens. Consequently, McDonalds stopped selling chicken fed on soy grown in newly deforested areas of the Amazon rainforest, and the big food retailer started to cooperate with Greenpeace to protect Amazon5.
Concluding, NGOs have a significant role in environmental diplomacy. Their influence is of greater importance to alert government which are usually lobbied by corporations. In this way, they are the main agents who can initiate action by the governments.
Sources:
1
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/WorldOfChange/deforestation.php
2
http://www.cicero.uio.no/fulltext/index_e.aspx?id=1953
3 http://www.norway.org/ARCHIVE/policy/environment/regnskogen_i_brasil_en/
4
http://news.mongabay.com/2006/0406-greenpeace.html
5
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/news-and-blogs/news/mcvictory/
6
http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007413.html
7
I agree with you that NGOs have become a genuine source of opinion in international affairs and their aim to promote action has proved successful in many areas which may not have been possible without their existence.
ReplyDelete